This case provides an example of a right to terminate for convenience (or in this case a discretion not to proceed) imposing a limit on a defaulting party’s liability for loss of profit in the event of termination.
Document type: Insights
Last updated: 10 June 2022
First published: 10 May 2018
The document/page you are trying to view is password protected.
Please enter your password here
If you don't have a password and would like to access any restricted content please speak to your contact at QBE, or alternatively send us an email.
